A RISK ADMINISTRATION MODEL FOR FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to study the conditions and problems of school risk administration concerning finance and procurement and to develop a risk administration model for finance and procurement in secondary schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education, in Northeastern, Thailand, during the academic year 2011. The procedure of the research was divided into four steps:1) Explored the conditions and problems of school risk administration of finance and procurement from a sample of 60 schools and defined a conceptual framework in accordance with the hypothesis model. 2) Arranged a seminar of 24 experts in order to brainstorm and share personal opinions on the problems, scrutinized a hypothetical model to verify its validity and revised the risk administration model for finance and procurement in secondary schools to be more complete in detail. 3) Implemented the complete model which was validated by the experts from step no. 2) for its accuracy, suitability and could be put into beneficial practice in Kanthararom school, Kanthararom district, Si Sa Ket province for two months. At the end of the experiment the administrative committees concluded the model was very suitable and teachers were very much involved in solving problems. Administration operation according to the model promoted great effectiveness in work and problem solving.The useful model could continue to proceed.4) Made the final adjustments from the
trial experiment in step no.3) and wrote the research conclusions.
Research results revealed that a risk administration model for finance and procurement in secondary schools was accurate, complete and could henceforth be put into useful practice allowing the teachers to be greatly involved in solving problems. Administration operation promoted work efficiency and was effective in solving the problems.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aran Sotethipan. (2007). Integration of Knowledge on Modern Public Administration. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from “http://www.netcomuk.co.uk” netcomuk. co.uk. 13. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Tread Way Commission (COSO).
(2008). Enterprise Risk - Management - Integrated Framework. [Online]. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://www.COSO/org/publictions.htm.
Fuengfah Tienprapasit. (2007). Risk Management Office of the Auditor General of Thailand . Retrieved November 22, 2007. from http://phdb.moph. go.th/newsdoc/ files/9/39107477.ppt.
Higher Education Institutions Ethics Integrity at Work. (2004). Higher Education Risk Factors and Definition. [Online]. Retrieved December 22, 2007, from http://hccs.edu./hcc/system%20Home/Departments/Internal_Audit/ Risk/%20Assessment%20P2- Ethicspoint.pdf.3-8.
Juree Vijit -Vadakan. (2006). “ The Image of Corruption Index Annual Year B.E. 2549.” Teacher Civil Service Journal. 51(5). 52 – 53.
Kasem Phucharoentam (2006). Risk Management System Development For Finance and Procurement Office of the President Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University. Nakhon Sawan.
Keeves, J.P. (1988). Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kornchailert Pamai. (2003). Regulation of OCSC within reporting of disciplinary action and retirement of teacher civil service and education personnel.
Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://203.146.15.33/webtcs/ modules.php?.
Kornchailert Pamai. (2005). Regulation of OCSC within reporting of disciplinary action and retirement of teacher civil service and education personnel B.E.2548. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from
Kritsanapong Saivorn. (2005). Financial Management in Basic Education Schools Amnatcharoen Educational Service Area Office. Thesis, Master Degree in Education. Ubonratchathani: Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University.
Matichon Online. (2008). “National Ranking Corruption.” Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.matichon.co.th/news_detail.php?newsid=1222173825.
Office of the Auditor General of Thailand. (1996). Annual Fiscal Year Performance Report. Bangkok: Office of the Auditor General of Thailand
Office of the Civil Service Commission. (2001). Thailand Corruption Report. Bangkok: Office of the Civil Service Commission.
Pipat Yodprudtikan. (2007). New Government with corruption and transparency. Bangkokbiznews online. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www. nidambe11.net/ekonomiz/2007q4/2007december25p3.htm.
Prakob Kulkliang. (2006). A Risk Management Model for Preventing Corruption in Basic Education. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy in Education. Phitsanulok:Faculty of Eduacation, Naresuan University.
Prasart Suebka. (2009). “Modern Thai University Must Manage Risk-Crisis.” Daily Matichon. July 21, 2009: page 23.
Prasert Akkharaprathompong. (2007). Documentation for discussion of risk management Chulalongkorn University. May 3, 2007: 2
Rattana Buosonte. (2002). Corruption in Educational Management of Thailand: A Case Study in Lower Northern Legion. Department of Academic Phitsanulok: Faculty of Education Naresuan University.
Thanchuda Amornpetchkul. (2003). Risk Management System Development In Supplies Division, Office of Planning and Finance, Chulalongkorn University. Thesis, Master of Engineering (Industrial Engineering). Faculty of Engineering. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Thawhanrat Worathepputthipong. (1997). Public Policy Formulation and Analysis :Theory and Application. Bangkok: Sematham. The National Anti-Corruption
Commission. (1999). Annual Year Performance Report 1994-1999. Bangkok: The Amarin Printing and Publishing Public Company Limited.
The Scottist Government Public Sector. (2007). Risk Management: Annex3. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/ topics/ Government/Finance/spfm/riskannex3.
Utumporn Jamornmarnn. (1998). “Model.” Academic Journal. 1(2):22-26.
Willer, D. (1986). Scientific Sociology :Theory and Method. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall.