A Proposed Policy to Develop Efficacy of Small Schools Integration Under Basic Education in the Northeast
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to formulate, analyze and form a proposed policy to develop efficacy of small schools integration under basic education in the northeast focusing on both objectives and practices. The research study was treated under 2 phases: the first was forming a proposed policy raft draft through survey research institute and multiple case studies with a questionnaire as a tool for collecting data and also an interview for qualitative analysis. The second phase was a proposed policy analysis through depth interview under focus group of 7 experts as well as seminar discussion through 45 stakeholders as the population for a proper and possible proposed policy under data qualitative analysis. The research results were as follows: 1)The small schools integration management aims to improve criteria, school objectives and proper running periods under 5 practice ways, 2) The personnel management aims to improve roles of school administrators, teachers, teaching supporters and basic education committees congruence with the law under 9 practice ways, 3) The academic management aims to revise curriculum, learning process, regulations over evaluation and measurement, internal school supervision, media, innovation and educational technology, and library as well as learning resources in schools integration use efficiently under 13 practice ways, 4) The finance, materials and assets management aims to revise roles and develop a way of finance and materials management at pre-time before school integration announcement for being able to manage along with the regulation efficiently under 8 practice ways, 5) The general management aims to revise general affair administration, participation, cooperation, and student affair before the school integration announcement to have management efficiently under 10 practice ways, 6) The journey for school integration aims to revise criteria, setting conditions, and budget allocation as well as school roles to have management efficiently under 11 practice ways.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aphinya Onjing. (2009). Developing Ways of General Affair Operation of Small Schools under Office of Education Pranakhonsriayutthaya Area 1 and 2: A Case Study of Watthammai School, Watsriphawang School, and Watlardrahong School. M.Ed. Thesis (Educational Administration), Pranakhonsriayutthaya: Pranakhonsriayutthaya Rajabaht University.
Bancha Phookongmake. (2006). A Process of Small School Administration of Excellence: A Case Study of Khambong 1 School under Office of Education Mukdaharn Area. M.Ed. Thesis (Educational Administration), SakonNakhorn: SakonNakhorn Rajabaht University.
Bunmark Kosentor. (2007). A Process of Small School Administration under PasakSridonmul School Group, ChiangSaen District, Chiang Rai Province. M.Ed. Thesis, Chiang Rai: Chiang Rai Rajabaht University.
Bunpeng Pansrima. (2008). A Problem of Participation in Education Management of Small School Basic Education Committee under Office of Education Roi-Ed Area 3. M.Ed. Thesis (Educational Administration), Roi-Ed: Roi-Ed
Rajabaht University.
Campee Sudtae. (2010). Developing a Model of Academic Administration for a Small School. Ed.D. Thesis (Educational Management), MahaSarakham: Mahasarakham Rajabaht University.
Genya Pinjan. (2004). Developing Practice Ways for Small School Integration under Office of Primary Education, Chiangsaen District, Chiang Rai Province. M.Ed. Thesis, Chiang Rai: Chiang Rai Rajabaht University.
Jeeranan Nanta-ngern. (2003). Small School Integration Running under Office of Primary Education Utaradit Province: A Case Study of Chumchon Phalerad Withayakhan School. M.Ed. Thesis, Utaradit: Utaradit Rajabaht University.
Khanat Thatthorng. (2009). Developing School Curriculum Based on Core Curriculum for Basic Education B.E. 2551. NakhonPrathom: Petkasaem Printing Press.
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. (2009). A Proposed Educational Reform in Two Decades (B.E. 2552-2561). Bangkok: Prickwarn Graphic.
Office of the Primary Education Maha Sarakham Area 1. (2011). A Meeting of School Directors under Office of the Primary Education MahaSarakham Area 1. (Conference Paper)
O-sot Thongmee and PhacharaPrawalpit. (2004). Budget Management. In Educational Institute Management Unit 1-7. Bangkok: Sukhothaithamathirach University.
Panthorng Pathikae. (2005). A Problem of Small School Administration under Office of Education Maha Sarakham Area 2. M.Ed. Thesis Maha Sarakham: Mahasarakham Rajabaht University.
Phithan Phuenthong. (2005). A ProposedPolicy to Develop Capacity of Small School in the Northeast.. Ed.D. Thesis (Educational Administration), KhonKaen: KhonKaen University.
Phaiboon Khamjing. (2006). The Living Library of Small School Master Administration of Living Library Activity Management under Office of Education Phetchabun Area 2. M.Ed. Thesis (Educational Administration), Phetchabun: Phetchabun Rajabaht University.
Suthat Prasartsuwan. (2001). Developing Small School Management Efficacy: A Case Study of A School Integration under Office of Primary Education, Phrao District, Chiangmai Province. M.Ed. Thesis, Chiangmai: Chiangmai University.