An Evaluation of the Master Degree Program in Educational Administration (Revised 2011), Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University by CIPP Model
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the curriculum of the master degree program in Educational Administration (Revised 2011), Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University, using the CIPP Model and evaluating in four dimensions: context, input, process, and product. The population in this research was 886 people and the sample was 275 people. The independent variables were lecturers, bachelor’s degree students, master’s degree students, and superiors whose subordinates with master’s degree students. The instruments were four The results were as follows:1. The evaluation of the curriculum in context, there was a high level of appropriateness ( x̅=4.26). When considering each of the following variables, the research found that the opinions of lecturers ( x̅=4.58) was highest agreement level while the opinions of bachelor’s degree students ( x̅=4.03) and master’s degree students ( x̅=4.18) were just high agreement level. 2. The evaluation of the curriculum in input, there was a high level of appropriateness ( x̅=3.84). When considering each of the following variables, the research found that the opinions among lecturers ( x̅=3.69), bachelor’s degree students ( x̅=3.88), and master’s degree students (x̅=3.96) were at a high agreement level. 3. The evaluation of the curriculum in process, there was a high level of appropriateness (x̅=4.05). When considering each of the following variables, the research found that the opinions among lecturers ( x̅=4.27), bachelor’s degree students ( x̅=3.86), and master’s degree students ( x̅=4.03) were at a high agreement level. 4. The evaluation of the curriculum in product, there was a high level of appropriateness ( x̅=4.47). When considering each of the following variables, the research found that the opinions of lecturers ( x̅=4.45) and master’s degree students ( x̅=4.26) were high agreement level while superiors whose subordinates with master’s degree students ( x̅=4.71) was highest agreement level.
In conclusions, the curriculum of the master degree program in Educational Administration (Revised 2011), Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University, there were high agreement levels in context, input, and process while product was the highest agreement level.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Chomphun Kunchon at Ayuthaya. (1987). Documents relating to curriculum development. 2nd edition. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
Department of Educational administration. (2011). Strategic Plan Department of Educational administration 2011-2022. Mahasarakham: Faculty of Education 2-5 ; July, Mahasarakham University.
Department of Educational administration. (2011). Master of Education
Department of Education administration (Program in 2011). Mahasarakham: Faculty of Education Mahasarakham University.
Jaras suwanwela and et. (1997). On Higher Education. Bangkok: printer of Chulalongkorn University.
Nutthinee Nuansakul. (2005). An Evaluation of the Science Program (Kasetsart) (Revised 1992) Of Ubon Ratchathani University. Thesis graduate studies Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
Phinyo Sathon. (1999). “An Evaluation for Education Development,” Of curriculum development 12(7): 2-7 ; October.
Office Board of Education. (2008). Guide to quality assurance within academy Higher Education revised Edition. Bangkok: printing.
Saran Laohaphan. (2009). An Evaluation Master of Education Department of Sociology 2538 AD Khon Kaen University. Thesis Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University.
Sermsree Chaisorn. (1996). Curriculum System - Teaching. Chiang Mai: Phrasing Printing Somnuk Phatthiyatanee. (2003) An Evaluation for Bachelor of Science Public Health (Up to 2 years) Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Mahasarakham University. Mahasarakham: Department of Research and Development Faculty of Education Mahasarakham University.
Soomboon Sirisunhiran (2006). An Evaluation for Master of Arts Department of Public Administration Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities Mahidol University. Thesis Nakorn Pathom ; Mahidol University.
Stuffebeem Danial L. (1971). “Education Evaluation and Decision Making,” Education Evaluation: Theory and Practice. p 128 – 142. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Uthumphon Jamonman. (2002). Evaluation Guide Training Program. Bangkok: Faculty of Education Chulalongkorn University.
Waraporn Trachoo. (1999). An Evaluation for Bachelor of Engineering Department of Industrial Engineering (Revised) 2537 AD Of King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. Thesis graduate studies Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.