Administrative Model of Effectiveness at Small school
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research. To study the effectiveness of small schools. The effective management of a small school. And research in this 4-step process is divided into four phases: Phase 1 study of the elements of the model. By the school administrators or comment in the acting or the Acting interviewed 181 teachers and 181 schools and school master three core elements and sub-elements analysis. Assessment by the expert 17 Step 2: Create the layout and manual layout. Rated by 5 experts to assess the appropriate step 3. And the feasibility of the model. By a total of 25 people and the four-step model is proposed. Using the Focus Group of 30 experts. The knowledge. And expertise. The form of a small school effectiveness. Evaluation. Feasibility And the benefits of a small school administrative The research findings were as follows:1. Component of the effective management of a small school. The main elements of the first academic administration. The two main elements of the administration budget. The main elements of the three management personnel. And General Administration. When considering all that. Appropriate and feasible. In most all of the same level.
2. Affect the management style small school effectiveness revealed that the model includes: 1) Background 2) Objectives 3) management model 4) management model 5) the forms to be used. 6) evaluation model and 7) performance evaluation by an expert guide to the overall level is appropriate.
3. Evaluation management model small school effectiveness revealed that overall the model schools with small effective in 1) Background 2) Objectives 3) how to manage the form 4. ) management model 5) the forms to be used. (How to use the form. Terms of success) 6) evaluation model and 7) are appropriate and effective as possible. Levels in most every aspect.
4.A proposed model and evaluation. Feasibility And useful. Levels in most every point. Considering it was also found that there is a reasonable Feasibility And is the highest level on all sides.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Chatana Janbanjong. (2545). Education the Administration and Manage of Organization Local Government in Japan.Bangkok:Amarint printing and publishing Ltd, company public.
Pitan Puengtong. (2548). Propose policy to improve small school in the northest. Thesis Bachelor of education Department of Educational Administration Graduate School. Khonkan University,Khonkhan.
Boonchom Srisa-art. (2545). Preliminary research Edition 7: Suweeriyasarn,
Ratchapon Konchanrungrord. (2548). Tansamai school, Bangkok Sutthakarnpim Company.
Wiroad Juntasing. (2542). Administration small school of Award ceremony case study Banmookmunnon-udomsamakki School Nakornratchasrima Privince. Thesis Bachelor of Education. Mahasarakam University.
Tawatchai Prempree. (2542). Factor required of Administration, Bangkok Aksorn-thai Printer.
Teera Roojareun. (2550). Professional Management of Education. Education reform, Bangkok: Khawfang.
Somporn Faungroad. (2541). The importance in the Mission of school AdministrationPrimary, case study of Ud-taradid Province. Thesis Narasaun University, Or-rapin Sopchokchai.Management of Systems Search date 2 August.
G.E. Austin, D. Reynolds. (1990). Managing for improved school effectiveness: An international survey. school Organization 10, 2/3
Bower, M. (1997). Developing leader in a business. The mckinsey quarterly,: 4,14.
Jhon A. Herzog, (1990). Variables Contributing to Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison Between National Exemplary Secondary Schools and Lutheran Secondary schools. (DAI 51/01//DA,: 2011.
Keeves,P.J. (1988). Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Mescon, M. H., Albert, M., & Feanklin.(1985). Mangement Individual and organizational elfectiveness ( 2nd ed). New York: Harper & Row.
Smith, E.W.et al. (1961).The education’s encyclopedia. New York: Prentice-Hall.