The Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership and Organizational Innovation Climate on Innovation Performance
Keywords:
ambidextrous leadership, open leadership, conservative leadership, organizational innovation climate, innovation performanceAbstract
Amid rapid economic transformation and intensifying competition, continuous innovation is vital for sustainable advantage. This study examines (1) whether ambidextrous leadership—integrating open and conservative styles—affects employee innovation performance, and (2) how organizational innovation climate influences that relationship. The researcher surveyed 405 employees at new energy vehicle firms in Xi’an, China, using validated scales for open leadership, conservative leadership, innovation climate, and self-reported innovation performance. Pearson correlations and structural equation modeling tested the hypotheses. Results showed that both leadership dimensions significantly enhance innovation performance: open leadership fosters ideation and risk-taking, while conservative leadership provides the structure and resources needed for implementation. Additionally, a supportive innovation climate—marked by transparent communication, managerial encouragement, and resource availability—amplifies these effects. These findings highlight the need for leaders to balance exploratory and exploitative behaviors and for organizations to cultivate climates that encourage experimentation and collaboration. Practical recommendations include training leaders in situational ambidexterity and designing policies that reinforce open dialogue and resource support. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, self-report measures, and focus on a single industry and locale. Future research should adopt longitudinal, multi-source approaches and explore these dynamics in varied cultural and sectoral contexts.
References
Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0089-5
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Anderson, N. R., & The researcherst, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 235–258.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
Cetindamar, D., & Ulusoy, G. (2008). Innovation performance and partnerships in manufacturing firms in Turkey. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380810862130
Chen, X. (2006). A process model of the influence of organizational innovation atmosphere on employee creativity (Master’s thesis). Zhejiang University.
Cheng, C.-C. (2015). Impact of organizational support on innovation behaviors: A study in the high-tech sector. Journal of Business and Management, 21(5), 657–678.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274.
Duan, H., Wei, X., & Pan, Z. (2023). The role of structured leadership behaviors in translating creativity into performance. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113472
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creativity self-efficacy. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9233-9
Gu, Q., Sevilla, J. P., & Fisher, C. D. (2014). Motivated by uncertainty: The role of learning goal orientation and risk-taking propensity in creative performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9310-8
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798186
Han, J. (2011). Employee innovation performance: Concept, measurement, and influencing factors. Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(2), 45–58.
He, W., Wang, L., & Zhang, L. (2024). The role of organizational innovation climate in fostering employee creativity: A multilevel perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09876-5
Hou, Y., Fan, D., & Liu, X. (2019). Benevolent and authoritarian leadership in Chinese organizations: A paradox perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101333
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size (PEOD-6). University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service.
Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader–member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159585
Kauppila, O. P., & Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). Change manager ambidexterity: The organizational emergence of ambidextrous leadership. Small Group Research, 47(2), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415623694
Li, D. (2020). Job flourishing and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00284
Li, J., & Cai, W. (2021). The impact of national policy on new energy vehicle innovation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125720
Li, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Open leadership and employee innovation: Evidence from Chinese high-tech firms. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.002
Liu, J. (2018). Organizational innovation climate and psychological safety: Their impact on innovative behavior. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(2), 114–123.
Luo, J., Reilly, G., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and organizational performance in high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2419–2428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.042
Luu, T. T. (2019). Directive leadership and innovation implementation: The moderating role of employee learning orientation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2018-0106
Mai, Z., Sun, J., & Basant, R. (2017). Leadership styles and employee creativity: The role of cultural intelligence. Journal of Business & Psychology, 32(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9458-1
Martin, R. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 55(3), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2013.55.3.72
Nazir, S., Shafique, M., & Salleh, Z. (2016). Organizational climate and innovation performance in small and medium enterprises: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(S1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12223
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Pan, W. (2020). Innovation self-efficacy and its impact on employee innovation behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
Ran, L., Zheng, X., & Peng, Y. (2017). Developing a scale for measuring organizational innovation climate in SMEs: A grounded theory approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(6), 1750050. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500509
Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2017). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2186
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership–innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Sui, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Stone-Romero, E. (2012). The empirical link between organizational climate and knowledge management: A study in Spanish firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 802–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262783
Tangney, B. S., & Boone, C. A. (2004). Organizational climate for innovation: Measurement and validation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 116–122.
Tu, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Team conflict and knowledge worker innovation performance: Evidence from China. Management Decision, 58(6), 1110–1132. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1083
Wang, X. (2018). The role of employee innovation in firm performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(3), 1850012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500124
Wang, X., Zhao, Y., & Liu, H. (2022). Investment and innovation dynamics in China’s new energy vehicle sector. Technovation, 110, 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102404
Xu, H. (2013). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 3(2), 14–27.
Yating, L., Mei, H., & Rong, S. (2024). Leadership styles and employee innovation performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113567
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0992
Zheng, J. J., Jin, S. H., & Ma, G. Y. (2009). Measurement of organizational innovation climate and its moderating effect on the relationship between employee innovation ability and innovation performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(12), 1203–1214.
Zheng, J., Chen, H., & Ma, G. (2023). Open leadership behaviors and frontline employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Management Studies, 60(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12812
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
