An Analytical Study on the Development of the Thailand–China Cross-Cultural Art Industry
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the context of globalization and digital transformation, the cross-cultural art industry has increasingly become a key driver of cultural exchange and economic development. Focusing on the Thailand–China context, this study adopts a qualitative analytical approach based on a systematic literature review and multiple case analysis. It integrates Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, and psychological adaptation theory to construct a comprehensive analytical framework.
The findings derived from literature and case synthesis indicate that cultural adaptation and cultural innovation jointly function as central mechanisms shaping cross-cultural art industry development. Technological advancement and market-oriented strategies further enhance the effectiveness of cross-cultural communication and industrial integration. However, persistent challenges remain, including cultural distance, structural imbalance in industry development, and insufficient integration between technological innovation and cultural content.
This study contributes by proposing an integrated conceptual framework that explains the interaction between cultural, linguistic, and psychological factors in cross-cultural industry dynamics. It also provides practical implications for Thailand–China cultural cooperation and highlights the necessity of future empirical validation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Brislin, R. W. (Ed.). (1977). Culture learning: Concepts, applications, and research. University Press of Hawaii.
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Doubleday. https://monoskop.org/images/5/57/Hall_Edward_T_The_Silent_Language.pdf
He, Y. Q. (2022). Cross-cultural communication of Chinese mobile games in Thailand[Master’s thesis, Guangxi University].
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
International Telecommunication Union. (2025). Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2025. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
Jin, D. Y. (2021). Transnational Korean cinema: Cultural politics, film genres, and digital technologies. Routledge.
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
PwC. (2024, June 16). Global entertainment and media outlook 2024–2028. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2024/pwc-global-entertainment-and-media-outlook-2024-28.html
Treiblmaier, H., & Tumasjan, A. (2022). Editorial: economic and business implications of blockchain technology. Front. Blockchain, 5, 857247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2022.857247
UNESCO. (2022). Re|Shaping Policies for Creativity: Addressing culture as a global public good. https://www.unesco.org/reports/reshaping-creativity/2022/en
UNCTAD. (2024). World investment report 2024: International investment in the digital economy. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2024