Bottlenecks and Breakthrough Paths of Digital Transformation in Governance of Private Higher Educational Institutions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the in-depth advancement of the national education digitalization strategy and the deep penetration of artificial intelligence and big data technologies into the education sector, private higher educational institutions (HEIs) as an important component of the higher education system, need to promote digital transformation of governance under the dual attributes of "educational public welfare" and "market flexibility" to solve traditional governance problems and achieve an upgrade from "experience-based governance" to "digital governance". This paper takes the Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology (GZIST) as a case study. By defining the core concepts of governance and digital transformation of governance in private HEIs and relying on the theories of collaborative governance, technology-institutional mutual construction, and data-driven decision-making, it first reviews the initial practices of digital governance at the institution, including the construction of a smart campus framework, the introduction of intelligent teaching management systems and Office Automation (OA) systems, and the establishment of a research project management platform. Then, it analyzes the three core bottlenecks commonly faced by the private HEIs, namely, system isolation and mismatch of demands at the technology adaptation level, ambiguous rights and responsibilities, and lagging rules at the institutional guarantee level, and insufficient participation and lack of interdepartmental coordination at the subject collaboration level. Finally, it proposes three targeted breakthrough paths: constructing a "unified middleware + customized development" technology system, improving a "clear rights and responsibilities + rule adaptation" institutional framework, and establishing a "multi-party participation + cross-departmental coordination" collaborative mechanism, with the aim of providing theoretical references and replicable practical solutions for the digital transformation of governance in private HEIs.
Article Details
References
Ajani, O. A., & Dlomo, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of digital transformation's impact on higher education institutions: A systematic literature analysis of public versus private sector. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.24193/JRHE.2024.1.4
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Buijsse, R., Willemsen, M., & Snijders, C. (2023). Data-driven decision-making. In W. Liebregts, W.-J. van den Heuvel, & A. van den Born (Eds.), Data science for entrepreneurship: Principles and methods for data engineering, analytics, entrepreneurship, and the society (pp. 239-277). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19554-9_11
Haas, O., Hutzler, M., Egginger, T. H., Maier, A., & Rothgang, E. (2021). Automating time-consuming and error-prone manual nursing management documentation processes. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 39(10), 584-591. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000790
Jin, X., & Dai, Y. (2024). Data-driven technology, organizational structure, and interdepartmental data sharing: the case of government-led digital projects in Guangzhou. Chinese Political Science Review, 10, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-024-00257-z
Li, Z., & Zhang, W. (2025). Technology in education: Addressing legal and governance challenges in the digital era. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 8413-8443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13036-9
Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Nandi, E. (2021). Governance, performance and quality in higher education: Evidences from a case study. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 19(1), 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849211056380
Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2023). Technologizing bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19338-19354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
Shyiramunda, T., & van den Bersselaar, D. (2024). Local community development and higher education institutions: Moving from the triple helix to the quadruple helix model. International Review of Education, 70(1), 51-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10037-7
Su, X., Mou, C., & Zhou, S. (2023). Institutional environment, technological innovation capability and service-oriented transformation. PloS ONE, 18(2), e0281403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281403
Yang, X., & Prasansaph, W. (2024). Research on the modernization of private higher education management systems in China. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(3), 18561-18575. https://bpasjournals.com/library-science/index.php/journal/article/view/849