Innovation and Development of Traditional Folk Dances from the Perspective of Digital Integration
Main Article Content
Abstract
From the perspective of digital integration, the innovative development of Chinese traditional national folk dances. The construction of the subjectivity of cultural consumption lays the foundation for the digital integration and innovation of China’s traditional ethnic and folk dances, the transformation of cultural heritage into aesthetic capital, the needs of The Times for the re-creation of China's traditional ethnic and folk dances and the promotion of Chinese traditional culture, and forms the digital integration and innovation mechanism of China's traditional ethnic and folk dances. Explore the innovation and development of Chinese traditional folk dance by integrating multi-culture and art, multi-scene expression, and multi-technology symbiosis. Continuously promoting the globalization of Chinese traditional culture and its development is an important content of the current construction of China’s cultural powerhouse and an important historical mission of realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
Article Details
References
Bou, E. (2016). Teaching elephants to dance: Collaborating to create a sustainable future. Renewable Energy Focus, 17(3), 95-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2016.04.006
Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Lenhart, C., Carter, R., Mundorff, K., Cho, H., & Knoch, J. (2021). Inclusively recognizing faculty innovation and entrepreneurship impact within promotion and tenure considerations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030182
Bozic Yams, N. (2018). The impact of contemporary dance methods on innovative competence development. Journal of Business Research, 85, 494-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.028
Hubner-Benz, S., & Frese, M. (2023). Chapter 26 - Creativity in entrepreneurship: Dancing between nothing and structure. In R. Reiter-Palmon & S. Hunter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Second Edition) (pp. 377-392): Academic Press.
Ibarra-Vazquez, G., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Miranda, J. (2023). Data Analysis in factors of social entrepreneurship tools in complex thinking: An exploratory study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101381
Kalnbalkite, A., Brakovska, V., Terjanika, V., Pubule, J., & Blumberga, D. (2023). The tango between the academic and business sectors: Use of co-management approach for the development of green innovation. Innovation and Green Development, 2(4), 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100073
Khalid, S., Dixon, S., & Vijayasingham, L. (2022). The gender responsiveness of social entrepreneurship in health – A review of initiatives by Ashoka fellows. Social Science & Medicine, 293, 114665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114665
Kraus, S., Vonmetz, K., Bullini Orlandi, L., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and digitalization for disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122638
Makaya, C., Blanco, C., & Barrédy, C. (2023). Towards an ecological approach for interaction management in entrepreneurship courses. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113749
Murry, L. T., Murry, J. S., Witry, M. J., & Pick, A. (2023). Perspectives of professionalism, self-awareness, leadership, and innovation and entrepreneurship from experiential education preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87(8), 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100106
Oganisjana, K., & Laizans, T. (2015). Opportunity–oriented problem–based learning for enhancing entrepreneurship of university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.416
Pereira, D., Leitão, J., Oliveira, T., & Peirone, D. (2023). Proposing a holistic research framework for university strategic alliances in sustainable entrepreneurship. Heliyon, 9(5), e16087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16087
Schaeffer, P. R., Guerrero, M., & Fischer, B. B. (2021). Mutualism in ecosystems of innovation and entrepreneurship: A bidirectional perspective on universities’ linkages. Journal of Business Research, 134, 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.039
Wang, C., & Fu, B. (2023). A study on the efficiency of allocation and its influencing factors on innovation and entrepreneurship education resources in Chinese universities under the five-in-one model. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100755
Yongliang, W. (2023). Organic integration of ideological and political education and entrepreneurship education based on artificial neural network. Learning and Motivation, 84, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101933
Zhang, H., Zhang, D., & Jin, Y. (2023). Does expansion of college education benefit urban entrepreneurship and innovation in China? Heliyon, 9(11), e21813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21813
Zhou, F., Zhang, N., & Mou, J. (2022). Universities as incubators of innovation: The role of a university playfulness climate in teachers' sustainable teaching innovation. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100693
Zhou, Y., & Zhou, H. (2022). Research on the quality evaluation of innovation and entrepreneurship education of college students based on extenics. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 605-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.074