Strategic Public Relations for Thai Higher Education Institutions in the VUCA Era

Authors

  • Nutt Dechapanya Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat Unuversity
  • Parichart Preechakorn Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat Unuversity
  • Thikamporn Thaweedech Thonburi University
  • Sombat Teekasap Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat Unuversity

Keywords:

Higher Education Public Relations, VUCA, Strategic Adaptation, Stakeholders

Abstract

This academic article examines how volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) affect public relations in Thai higher education. Drawing on recent policy documents and reports, it proposes a five-stage adaptive communication framework: listen and verify, map stakeholders, co-design messages and channels, communicate with crisis readiness, and evaluate and revise. The framework links data and artificial intelligence with governance, privacy, and equitable access. Illustrative applications to student recruitment and complaint response show how institutions can use it in practice. The article argues that adaptive capacity depends on listening, verifiable evidence, and learning from outcomes rather than message volume. The proposed framework requires empirical testing across institutions with different contexts.

References

สำนักงานปลัดกระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. (2567). ข้อมูลนักศึกษา: สถิติอุดมศึกษา. https://info.mhesi.go.th/homestat_std.php

Berman, E. P., & Paradeise, C. (2016). The university under pressure. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 46, 1–21. [https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046001] (https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046001)

Breakenridge, D. (2012). Social media and public relations: Eight new practices for the PR professional. Pearson Education.

Chaffey, D. (2022). Digital marketing: Strategy, implementation and practice (8th ed.). Pearson.

Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Donovan, C. (2011). State of the art in assessing research impact: Introduction to a special issue. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635918

EAB. (2023). Marketing to Gen Z: Strategies for Higher Ed. https://eab.com/research/strategy/gen-z-marketing-higher-ed/

Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2008). Excellence theory in public relations: Past, present, and future. In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 327–347). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grunig, J. E. (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2015). Higher education consumer choice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization in the international higher education market. Journal of Business Research, 6(9), 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.019

Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Lozano, R. (2013). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(5), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325

Macnamara, J. (2018). Evaluating public communication: Exploring new models, standards, and best practice. Routledge.

Macnamara, J. (2016). Organizational listening: The missing essential in public communication. Peter Lang Publishing.

Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education.

Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. Routledge.

Theunissen, P. (2013). Public relations and the commons: A strategic and ethical imperative. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.05.002

UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023a). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms?. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology

UNESCO. (2023b). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4177–4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660

Wiesenberg, F., & Whitton, J. (2017). Data-driven communication in higher education: PR strategy meets analytics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(2-3), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2017.1326825

World Bank. (2023). Thailand Higher Education Reform: Strategic Directions for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. JISC CETIS White Paper.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Dechapanya, N., Preechakorn, P., Thaweedech, T., & Teekasap, S. (2026). Strategic Public Relations for Thai Higher Education Institutions in the VUCA Era. Journal of Graduate Studies Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University, 10(1), 41–55. retrieved from https://so20.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bsru01grad/article/view/958

Issue

Section

Academic Article