Developing an Interdisciplinary Curriculum to Enhance Inompetency in Thai Higher Educationnovation C
Keywords:
Interdisciplinary Curriculum, Innovation Competency, Thai Higher Education, Triple Helix, Creative EconomyAbstract
A significant challenge in contemporary Thai higher education is the persistence of disciplinary silos in curriculum design. This lack of flexibility and interdisciplinary integration obstructs the development of students' innovation competency (OECD, 2019; Trilling & Fadel, 2009). Despite policies promoting the creative economy and integrated learning, a systemic mechanism for implementation encompassing budget allocation, evaluation metrics, and robust collaboration among universities, industry, and government (the Triple Helix model) remains underdeveloped (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000).
Addressing this gap, this academic article investigates a framework for developing interdisciplinary curricula in Thai higher education institutions. The proposed approach integrates knowledge from diverse fields such as science, technology, humanities, arts, and management, combined with experiential and problem-based learning methodologies (Jacobs, 2013; Kolb, 2015). The objective is to enhance students' innovation competency, which is conceptualized as a synergy of knowledge, skills, and attributes essential for creating innovations that drive sustainable development (UNCTAD, 2010). Findings indicate that effective curriculum development should be grounded in constructivist learning principles and aligned with the Triple Helix model, fostering a collaborative learning ecosystem responsive to dynamic societal needs.
The study concludes with a key recommendation: the development of interdisciplinary curricula in Thai higher education must feature a flexible structure that bridges disciplinary divides and promotes learning in authentic contexts. This approach is crucial for cultivating students with the competencies required to meet innovative demands and contribute to a sustainable future.
References
สำนักงานปลัดกระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. (2564). แผนด้านการอุดมศึกษาเพื่อ
ผลิตและพัฒนากำลังคนของประเทศ พ.ศ. 2564-2570. กระทรวงการอุดมศึกษา วิทยาศาสตร์ วิจัยและนวัตกรรม. https://www.mhesi.go.th/images/2564/Policy/HigherEdPlan_64-70_V2.pdf
สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการวิจัยแห่งชาติ. (2023). เกี่ยวกับเศรษฐกิจสร้างสรรค์. https://www.bcg.in.th/
creative-economy-about/
Chaisuwan, C., Suwannatthachote, P., & Kwiecien, K. (2012). Development of a blended
learning model with a problem-based approach for a computer programming course. Songklanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(2), 233–264. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/psujssh/article/view/171549
Chanthes, S. (2022). A model for developing digital citizenship of students in the faculty of
education, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. Journal of Education and Innovation, 24(1), 77–90. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/253907
Chanthes, S. (2023). Developing a learning process to enhance information and digital literacy
through project-based learning. Journal of Liberal Arts, Maejo University, 11(1), 164–182. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/liberalarts/article/view/260780
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems
and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Jacobs, J. A. (2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and the renewal of the
university. University of Chicago Press.
Kao, Y. S., Chen, Y. L., & Lo, M. C. (2023). Developing an interdisciplinary course for product
and media design by applying scaffolding and mentoring. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(5), 1845–1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09795-z
Kim, Y. (2020). The role of education in fostering innovation: A comparative analysis of
Finland, Singapore, and South Korea. Journal of Education and Economic Development, 6(2), 45–61.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and
Development. (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2010). New kinds of smart: How the science of learnable intelligence is changing education. Open University Press.
Nakwa, K., & Zawdie, G. (2016). University–industry–government partnership for innovation
and enterprise in Thailand. In T. T. Thuy & G. Zawdie (Eds.), Role of university in promoting innovation and new technology in agriculture. Vietnam National University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305216120
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019:
Thriving in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions.
http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic
Learning, 3(1), 1–10.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2010). Creative economy report
: Creative economy: A feasible development option. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctab20103_en.pdf
Wattanaporn, K., Puncreobutr, V., & Sombat, T. (2020). Developing an interdisciplinary course
for enhancing integrated citizenship identity. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 22(4), 16–29. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/
article/view/241804
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the x may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
other reuse or republication requires permission from the journal."